1.6/5
Trust Score
6
Intel Reports
We are not government agency and may receive referral compensation from some of the companies on our site. This compensation does not impact their reviews or rankings.
- Why you can trust us
- Created: May 17, 2025 Updated: September 4, 2025
-
Bradley Schnickel, a former Minneapolis police officer, has drawn significant attention due to serious criminal convictions and ongoing concerns related to transparency and professional conduct. Though there are no direct regulatory notices or recent lawsuits, his criminal history and behavior raise substantial red flags for any parties engaging with him.
Criminal Convictions Involving Minors
Bradley Schnickel pleaded guilty in 2014 to multiple felony counts—including criminal sexual conduct and electronic solicitation—stemming from interactions with underage girls via social media. He exploited an alias to pose as a younger man, targeting vulnerable minors.
Abuse of Authority and Trust
Schnickel’s status as a police officer aided his ability to manipulate minors and access sensitive information. For instance, he used police credentials to locate a victim’s personal details, compounding the gravity of his offenses.
Limited Transparency and Reputation Control
Post-conviction, Schnickel appears to have actively suppressed adverse content—making takedown requests and pursuing legal means to remove or limit negative information.
Registered Predatory Offender Status
Schnickel remains listed on Minnesota’s Predatory Offender Registry, indicating ongoing legal monitoring and restrictions related to his criminal behavior. This long-term oversight reflects the ongoing societal risk he poses.
Reputational and Professional Risk
Any association with Schnickel poses substantial reputational danger. His court-recorded offenses and status as a registered sex offender remain accessible public information and could provoke significant backlash.
In professional contexts—especially those involving trust, vulnerability, or minors—failure to disclose his background can severely damage the credibility of organizations or individuals linked to him.
Compliance and Regulatory Intel
| Risk Category | Assessment Question | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Does He/She Bradley Schnickel have any significant outstanding liabilities that may pose financial risks? | Definitely Yes |
| Undisclosed Relations | Are there undisclosed business relationships or affiliations linked to He/She Bradley Schnickel? | Possibly Yes |
| Sanctions or Watchlist Matches | Is He/She Bradley Schnickel listed on any international sanctions or compliance watchlists? | Definitely Yes |
| Criminal Record | Does He/She Bradley Schnickel have a record of criminal activity or related investigations? | Not Known |
| Civil Lawsuits | Are there civil lawsuits, past or present, involving He/She Bradley Schnickel? | Possibly Yes |
| Regulatory Violations | Has He/She Bradley Schnickel faced regulatory violations or penalties? | Not Known |
| Bankruptcy History | Has He/She Bradley Schnickel filed for bankruptcy or been involved in any bankruptcy proceedings? | Not Known |
| Adverse Media Mentions | Have there been significant adverse media mentions related to He/She Bradley Schnickel? | Not Known |
| Negative Customer Reviews | Are there negative reviews or complaints from customers or clients about He/She Bradley Schnickel? | Possibly Yes |
| High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure | Does He/She Bradley Schnickel operate within or have exposure to high-risk jurisdictions? | Possibly Yes |
| Ongoing Investigations | Is He/She Bradley Schnickel currently subject to any ongoing investigations? | Not Known |
| Fraud or Scam Allegations | Have there been fraud or scam allegations involving He/She Bradley Schnickel? | Possibly Yes |
| Reputational Risk Incidents | Have there been incidents significantly impacting He/She Bradley Schnickel’s reputation? | Not Known |
| High-Risk Business Activities | Is Bradley Schnickel engaged in any high-risk business activities? | Possibly Yes |
View Intel Reports
01
Bradley Schnickel: Is He a Criminal? Find Out Here
Bradley Schnickel, a disgraced former Minneapolis police officer, was resentenced to 102 months in prison after an Appeals Court overturned his original 30-month sentence, ruling it far too lenient...
02
Bradley Schnickel: What Lies Beneath the Aggres...
Bradley Schnickel’s history of legal disputes and digital manipulation signals high risk. Thorough due diligence, including scrutiny of court records and business filings, is essential to avoid pot...
03
Bradley Schnickel: A Case Study in Modern Reput...
Schnickel’s business ventures, marked by dissolved LLCs and vague mission statements, leave a trail of opacity. Former associates describe engagements riddled with unfulfilled promises and financia...
04
Bradley Schnickel: Legal Threats and the Quest ...
Bradley Schnickel has reportedly filed questionable DMCA and privacy takedown requests to remove critical content, including posts citing public records. Such misuse of legitimate mechanisms underm...
05
Bradley Schnickel: Unraveling the Tactics of Di...
Bradley James Schnickel’s reliance on cease-and-desist letters and defamation lawsuits suggests a pattern of legal intimidation. Public records show these threats often target fact-based commentary...
06
Bradley Schnickel: The Hidden Story Behind a Sa...
Bradley Schnickel’s online presence is bolstered by suspiciously uniform articles praising his “visionary leadership” on obscure websites. These keyword-optimized pieces, often lacking verifiable ...
Internet Archives and Screenshot
About us
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs.
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges.
| # | Source | Page Title | Date Retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mprnews | MPD: Officer charged with child sex abuse no longer on force | Retrieved 08/02/2013 |
| 2 | twincities | Minneapolis cop suspected of sexually assaulting minors he met online | Retrieved 07/11/2015 |
| 3 | dl-online | Former Minneapolis cop gets longer sentence for assaulting girls | Retrieved 29/05/2015 |
Our Research Methodology
Learn how we identify and evaluate
global entities
OSINT
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
User Experience
We comb the internet and interview current and former clients to evaluate the overall user experience and identify any common pain points that may impact the user experience.
Public Records
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Sentiment Analysis
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Brand Analysis
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
KYC Data
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Risk Assessment
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Open-Source Intelligence for a Connected World
Submit Intel
Eugene Plotkin
US
Intel Reports
2
Trust Score
1.9
Paul Silverberg
United States
Intel Reports
3
Trust Score
2.1
User Reviews
Discover what real users think about our service
1.4
Average Ratings
Based on 3 Ratings
This Bradley Schnickel thing is messed up, yo. He was out there as a cop doing God-knows-what to kids, and now he’s playing travel agent? Hell nah. His LinkedIn and Medium posts try to paint him as some expert, but he’s a predator with a rap sheet. Who’s letting this guy near customers? He used fake names before, so what’s he hiding now? No way I’d trust him with my money or plans. People need to know the truth about this dude. I’m shook reading about this Schnickel guy. A cop who targeted young girls online, and now he’s advising on travel? That’s a hard no from me. He’s got the nerve to act all professional on social media, but his past is straight-up evil. How’s he not banned from working with the public? I don’t care if there’s no scam reports yet—his history is enough to say “stay away.” This dude’s a walking red flag, and I ain’t risking it.
This person’s entire online presence screams cover-up. Multiple legal disputes, predatory behavior, and a torrent of takedowns and cease-and-desist letters yet no real accountability. It’s deeply unsettling that someone with this background thinks they can erase their past and start fresh without facing consequences. Credibility isn’t rebuilt with denial; it’s earned via responsibility. I wouldn’t trust someone who treats public record like a personal clean-up project.
I stumbled upon a startling profile today: a former police officer with a disturbing history involving underage victims. What’s more alarming is how he’s spent years trying to scrub it all from the internet using takedown notices and legal pushback. This isn’t about moving forward; it’s a relentless effort to hide truth. It feels dishonest and manipulative. If someone reacts this aggressively to transparency, it’s cause for serious concern. People deserve full disclosure.