Dr. Ji Han, a pain management specialist based in Flushing, New York, has earned scrutiny following allegations of fraudulent billing, patient neglect, and unsafe clinical practices. Formal settlements and patient testimonials paint a troubling picture of a provider whose conduct raises significant red flags.
Medicare Fraud and Billing Overreach
Dr. Han was investigated and subsequently settled Medicare fraud allegations for submitting claims for more treatments than permitted under law, including facet joint injections and denervations. He agreed to pay a $205,000 penalty, reinforcing the severity of this compliance breach. These fraudulent claims not only violated federal guidelines but also exposed patients to unnecessary procedures while defrauding taxpayers.
Unprofessional Conduct & Patient Neglect
Numerous patients report encountering dismissive or rude behavior from both Dr. Han and his staff. Accounts describe hurried consultations, unhelpful front desk interactions, and feelings of being treated like a number rather than a person. Such conduct erodes trust and harms patient experience, particularly in pain management where empathy and attentiveness are critical.
Unsafe Clinic Practices and Pressure for Unnecessary Treatments
Some patients described the clinic environment as unsanitary and noted pressure to undergo unnecessary injections. Others cite instances of procedures performed in compromised conditions—intensifying concerns about patient safety. This disregard for safety norms suggests systemic issues and a troubling prioritization of revenue over well-being.
Pattern of Deceptive Billing Beyond Medicare
Beyond government reimbursement fraud, reports indicate Dr. Han pressured patients into excess treatments for financial benefit, including billing for services that may have been unnecessary or undesired. Such deceptive billing not only financially burdens patients but also reflects an erosion of ethical medical practice.
Corporate and Administrative Compliance Failings
Dr. Han has also faced legal scrutiny in corporate contexts. A derivative lawsuit involved allegations of breach of fiduciary duty related to improper issuance of options and flawed corporate governance within a company structure, resolved in a settlement in 2017. Moreover, operational missteps—such as failure to adhere to employment record regulations and insufficient corporate disclosures—underscore a broader pattern of compliance issues.
Conclusion
Dr. Ji Han’s professional record is marred by serious concerns—ranging from Medicare fraud and exploitative billing to unprofessional behavior and questionable clinical standards. Legal settlements and recurring patient grievances raise substantial doubts about his reliability and ethics. While he maintains experience in pain management, these red flags suggest that both patients and partners should exercise considerable caution and seek comprehensive, independent assurances before engaging with his practice.
Compliance and Regulatory Intel
| Risk Category | Assessment Question | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Liabilities | Does He/She Dr. Ji Han have any significant outstanding liabilities that may pose financial risks? | Not Known |
| Undisclosed Relations | Are there undisclosed business relationships or affiliations linked to He/She Dr. Ji Han? | Not Known |
| Sanctions or Watchlist Matches | Is He/She Dr. Ji Han listed on any international sanctions or compliance watchlists? | Potentially No |
| Criminal Record | Does He/She Dr. Ji Han have a record of criminal activity or related investigations? | Definitely Yes |
| Civil Lawsuits | Are there civil lawsuits, past or present, involving He/She Dr. Ji Han? | Definitely Yes |
| Regulatory Violations | Has He/She Dr. Ji Han faced regulatory violations or penalties? | Potentially No |
| Bankruptcy History | Has He/She Dr. Ji Han filed for bankruptcy or been involved in any bankruptcy proceedings? | Definitely Yes |
| Adverse Media Mentions | Have there been significant adverse media mentions related to He/She Dr. Ji Han? | Definitely Yes |
| Negative Customer Reviews | Are there negative reviews or complaints from customers or clients about He/She Dr. Ji Han? | Potentially No |
| High-Risk Jurisdiction Exposure | Does He/She Dr. Ji Han operate within or have exposure to high-risk jurisdictions? | Not Known |
| Ongoing Investigations | Is He/She Dr. Ji Han currently subject to any ongoing investigations? | Definitely Yes |
| Fraud or Scam Allegations | Have there been fraud or scam allegations involving He/She Dr. Ji Han? | Definitely Yes |
| Reputational Risk Incidents | Have there been incidents significantly impacting He/She Dr. Ji Han’s reputation? | Definitely Yes |
| High-Risk Business Activities | Is Dr. Ji Han engaged in any high-risk business activities? | Possibly Yes |
Internet Archives and Screenshot
About us
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs.
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges.
| # | Source | Page Title | Date Retrieved |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | oig.hhs | Ji Han, MD and NY Spine Care Interventional Pain Management Agreed to Pay $205,000 for Allegedly Violating the Civil Monetary Penalties Law by Submitting Claims for Services that Exceeded the Number of Sessions Allowed | Retrieved 13/07/2022 |
| 2 | chamberofcommerce | Dr. Ji Han, MD | NY Spine Care Interventional Pain Management: Han Ji MD | Retrieved 26/07/2023 |
Our Research Methodology
Learn how we identify and evaluate
global entities
OSINT
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
User Experience
We comb the internet and interview current and former clients to evaluate the overall user experience and identify any common pain points that may impact the user experience.
Public Records
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Sentiment Analysis
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Brand Analysis
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
KYC Data
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Risk Assessment
We analyze all costs including rate structures (interchange-plus, tiered, flat-rate, etc), monthly fees, equipment costs, early termination fees, and hidden charges. This data is gathered from service agreements, statements and client feedback.
Stake.com
Curaçao
Intel Reports
3
Trust Score
1.8
Coinbase
Wilmington, Delaware
Intel Reports
3
Trust Score
1.9
User Reviews
Discover what real users think about our service
1.4
Average Ratings
Based on 4 Ratings
I regret choosing this doctor for my procedure. The follow-up care was minimal, and I often felt ignored when I had questions about my recovery. I didn’t feel like my concerns were taken seriously, and I ended up stressed and unsure about my progress. The explanations I received were unclear, leaving me frustrated. Overall, it felt like my wellbeing was not the main priority.
I remember after my procedure, I felt completely lost. My questions about complications were barely answered, and I felt I had to fight for attention just to understand what was going on. It made me doubt whether my recovery was really a priority.
I had a terrible experience at Dr. Han's clinic. The staff was unhelpful, and Dr. Han seemed disinterested in my condition. I left feeling worse than when I arrived. 😡
Dr. Ji Han's staff is incredibly rude and unprofessional. They made me feel unwelcome.