Dr. Richard Katz

Dr. Richard Katz, an orthopedic surgeon practicing in Albany, New York, is now flagged as a high-risk medical professional due to a significant malpractice verdict, poor patient reviews, and questions surrounding his professional transparency. Despite decades of experience and hospital affiliations, recent scrutiny suggests his reputation may be artificially bolstered, while real-world outcomes and patient care concerns raise serious questions about his competence and ethics. Scrutiny is growing not just for his medical decisions, but also how he’s managed public perception and patient trust.

Jury Verdict for Negligence
A jury found Dr. Katz and East River Medical Imaging, P.C. liable in a malpractice case (Moskowitz v. Katz), awarding $375,000 for past suffering and $200,000 for future pain and suffering. This verdict indicates strong evidence of negligence—specifically, failure to diagnose a broken orthopedic plate leading to a more invasive knee surgery. Efforts to overturn the judgment were denied, affirming the legal judgment against him.

Mixed Reviews Despite Affiliations
Dr. Katz maintains private practices and affiliations with major hospitals like Saint Peter’s and Ellis, yet patient feedback is strikingly uneven. With a 4.0/5 average rating from 54 patients, it’s lower than expected for a senior specialist—suggesting dissatisfaction with aspects of service delivery despite institutional backing.

Missed Diagnoses & Rushed Appointments
Multiple patient testimonials cite instances where Dr. Katz reportedly ignored symptoms, skipped essential orthopedic tests, and provided generalized care without focused attention. Many describe feeling rushed, dismissed, or underserved—prompting them to leave comments warning others to seek alternative practitioners.

Poor Bedside Manner
Patients consistently report that Dr. Katz displayed detached or condescending behavior. Some recount inadequate explanations, lack of empathy, or minimal engagement during visits. This underscores concerns not just about clinical quality but also about his approach to patient communication and empathy.

The cumulative evidence—legal liability, critical patient reviews, questionable outcomes, and lack of transparency—casts Dr. Richard Katz as a distinctly high-risk healthcare provider. While he remains established in Albany’s orthopedic community, both patients and institutions should treat engagement with caution. Clearer accountability and professional conduct improvements are urgently needed to restore confidence in his practice.