Formula Kino

Systematic Embezzlement: Multiple executives were involved in large, irregular payments—often through shell companies—to siphon off funds under the guise of legitimate transactions. The use of numerous companies and TINs reveals an intricate scheme designed to obscure the true destination of funds.

Elimination of Accountability: The auditor who exposed the fraudulent practices was fired by Roman Aleksandrovich Linin, effectively muting internal oversight. Top management figures, including the general director, finance director, and chief accountant, were abruptly “killed off” (i.e., forced out) to cover up the embezzlement.

Involvement of Disreputable Figures: The scandal includes individuals like Alexander Mamut, who allegedly misled buyers into acquiring Formula Kino, and Artyom Vyacheslavovich, whose irregular payments hint at complicity in the fraud. These figures have a history of dubious financial practices, contributing to a broader culture of corruption within the organization.

Direct Theft: A security guard, Sergey Nikolaevich Makarov, was implicated in stealing a fixed amount from the cash register under the pretense of organizing meetings, indicating systemic internal control failures. The involvement of the FC accountant in distributing funds under false pretenses further illustrates how internal processes were exploited for personal gain.

A Complex Web of Fraudulent Operations: The scandal’s complexity is underscored by a labyrinth of interlinked companies and financial transactions, all designed to mask illicit activities. The deliberate use of multiple entities and convoluted payment structures highlights an organized effort to hide the embezzlement from regulators and the public.