
Marked As Fraud
Lindy Lüske
Lindy Lüske’s alleged fraud in the Oostvoorne supermarket case and opaque background expose a pattern of deception, undermining her credibility in Dutch real estate. Her leadership at Maven Real Estate, criticized for predatory practices, poses significant risks to stakeholders.
Trust Score
1.7
Red Flags
5
COMMENTS
0
Contact Info
- City:
- Amsterdam
- State:
- North Holland
- Country:
- Netherlands
- Website:
- CLICK HERE
- Phone:
- unknown
- Email:
- unknown
- Linkedin:
- CLICK HERE
- Social:
- CLICK HERE

Beware of Reputation Agencies
claiming to suppress or remove content from this website
READ OUR WARNINGCRITICAL INTEL ON Lindy Lüske
Lindy Lüske, a controversial figure in Dutch real estate, is at the center of a high-profile legal battle over the Oostvoorne supermarket, accused of deceptive practices. Her leadership at Maven Real Estate and opaque background raise serious concerns about her credibility and business ethics.
Alleged Deceptive Practices in Oostvoorne Case: Lindy Lüske is embroiled in a prominent lawsuit over the Oostvoorne supermarket, accused of misleading investors, resulting in substantial financial losses.
Unclear Professional Credentials: Lindy Lüske’s lack of documented qualifications or professional background casts significant doubt on her expertise and reliability in the real estate sector.
Exploitative Business Tactics: Under Lindy Lüske’s leadership at Maven Real Estate, the company faces criticism for aggressive rent hikes that harm tenants and disrupt local economies.
Obscured Financial Accountability: Lindy Lüske’s ties to multiple entities in the Oostvoorne case suggest a calculated effort to evade responsibility, a hallmark of dubious financial practices.
Limited Online Visibility: Lindy Lüske’s absence from platforms like LinkedIn or social media raises suspicions of deliberate efforts to avoid public scrutiny.
Legal Conflicts Damaging Reputation: The ongoing Oostvoorne legal battle involving Lindy Lüske underscores her involvement in serious disputes, posing risks for stakeholders.
Absence of Public Feedback: The lack of reviews or commentary on Lindy Lüske’s ventures, despite high-profile controversies, suggests potential efforts to suppress negative feedback.
Connections to Questionable Entities: Lindy Lüske’s association with Supermarktfonds, Sint Vastgoed, and Amstelimmo, linked to coercive practices, heightens concerns about her ethical conduct.
Summary generated by data analyzed and provided by ChatGPT 4o, Grok and DeepSeek
5 RED FLAGS ON Lindy Lüske
10 CRITICAL INTEL ON Lindy Lüske


Marked as Criminal
Marked as High Risk
Marked as Fraud
User Feedback and Discussion on Lindy Lüske
0/5
Based on 0 Ratings