Cerebrum IQ’s False Narratives and Free Speech Suppression

Originally Syndicated on August 13, 2024 @ 9:43 am

What Happened?

Cerebrum IQ, a company that presents itself as a leader in cognitive training and educational tools, has been facing mounting criticism over its questionable business practices. Complaints from users, many of which can be found on platforms like Trustpilot, have raised red flags about misleading advertising, poor customer service, and unauthorized charges. These reviews point to a deeper pattern of unethical behavior, with customers feeling deceived and frustrated by the company’s tactics.

In an apparent effort to control the narrative, Cerebrum IQ has reportedly engaged in attempts to censor negative feedback and damaging news by issuing takedown requests and challenging unfavorable reviews. Despite these efforts, complaints continue to surface, drawing attention to the company’s history of dubious practices and lack of accountability.

The controversy surrounding Cerebrum IQ has prompted wider concerns about the transparency of businesses operating in the education and cognitive training sectors. As the company scrambles to protect its reputation, more voices are emerging, eager to expose the reality behind its slick marketing campaigns.

Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)

Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.

To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.

FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.

Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.

By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Cerebrum IQ and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…

List of Fake Copyright Notices for Cerebrum IQ

Evidence and Screenshots

Only Cerebrum IQ Benefit from this crime.

Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Cerebrum IQ  from Google, we assume Cerebrum IQ or someone associated with Cerebrum IQ  is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Cerebrum IQ . In this case, Cerebrum IQ , at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.

So, who tf is Cerebrum IQ ?

Cerebrum IQ is a company that markets itself as a provider of cognitive training tools, claiming to help users improve their memory, focus, and overall brain performance. However, the company has come under scrutiny due to a series of complaints and negative reviews that point to questionable business practices.

Why They Are Trying to Censor the Internet

Cerebrum IQ has been accused of attempting to control the narrative around its reputation by censoring negative feedback and reviews online. This includes efforts to suppress unfavorable comments on consumer review platforms like Trustpilot, where many dissatisfied customers have voiced concerns. These attempts at censorship are likely motivated by the need to protect their image and mitigate the fallout from growing public discontent about their services.

Major Concerns, Complaints, and Accusations

1. Misleading Advertising: Many users have claimed that the company’s advertisements make exaggerated claims about the effectiveness of their products, which fail to deliver the promised results.
2. Unclear Billing Practices: A significant number of reviews on Trustpilot report unauthorized charges or difficulties in canceling subscriptions. Customers have expressed frustration with being charged unexpectedly and struggling to receive refunds.
3. Poor Customer Support: Numerous reviews highlight the lack of responsiveness and inadequate support from the company’s customer service team, leaving users unable to resolve issues related to billing or product dissatisfaction.
4. Product Quality: There are complaints about the actual effectiveness of Cerebrum IQ’s services, with users stating that the tools provided did not offer any significant cognitive improvement, contrary to the company’s claims.

These complaints have fueled distrust in Cerebrum IQ, leading the company to allegedly resort to tactics like removing or discrediting negative reviews. Despite these efforts, customer dissatisfaction continues to surface across various platforms, bringing into question the company’s transparency and ethical practices.

For more detailed reviews, you can check out the feedback on Trustpilot.

Potential Consequences for Cerebrum IQ

Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.

Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.

Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)). 

Is Cerebrum IQ Committing a Cyber Crime?

Yes, it seems so. Cerebrum IQ used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Cerebrum IQ could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.

Faced with these limitations, some companies like Cerebrum IQ have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.

Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Cerebrum IQ is certainly keeping interesting company here….

The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.

Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.

What was Cerebrum IQ trying to hide?

Cerebrum IQ appears to be trying to hide a variety of negative reviews, complaints, and allegations related to unethical business practices and poor customer service. Here are the main concerns and adverse reports users have shared on platforms like Trustpilot and Sitejabber:

1. Misleading Advertising and False Promises:
   • Customers frequently report that Cerebrum IQ’s marketing is deceptive. The platform promises significant cognitive improvements and benefits that many users feel are exaggerated or unrealistic. This has led to dissatisfaction among those who expected more effective services based on the company’s claims.
2. Unauthorized Charges and Billing Issues:
   • One of the most common complaints is unauthorized credit card charges. Several users have mentioned signing up for what they believed were free trials or inexpensive services, only to find large sums charged to their accounts later. Many users expressed frustration over difficulty in canceling subscriptions or getting refunds​.
3. Difficult Cancellation and Poor Customer Support:
   • Customers frequently mention encountering roadblocks when trying to cancel their subscriptions. Despite repeated efforts to contact customer service, users report unresponsive or unhelpful support. This lack of transparency and support has fueled more negative feedback about the company​.
4. Questionable Business Practices:
   • There are allegations of predatory business practices, including making it difficult for users to understand the terms and conditions of the service or to cancel once signed up. Many customers believe the company intentionally hides these details to take advantage of consumers​.
5. Efforts to Suppress Negative Reviews:
   • Some users allege that Cerebrum IQ has made efforts to censor or remove negative feedback from the internet. This has included trying to take down critical reviews and challenging user complaints, raising further questions about the company’s transparency.

For more detailed feedback, you can explore reviews on Trustpilot and Sitejabber.